Talk:GSoC Ideas 2015: Difference between revisions

From wiki.openchemistry.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== cclib == I know there has been opposition of linking the Python interpreter into Avogadro for license and dependency reasons, but this seems to be a very straight-forward...")
 
Line 6: Line 6:


How fast OpenCube with generating surface data?
How fast OpenCube with generating surface data?
Not bad, but the VMD implementation is clearly faster, and I think with the EDT paper, a faster implementation of all types of surfaces could be found.

Revision as of 23:29, 24 January 2015

cclib

I know there has been opposition of linking the Python interpreter into Avogadro for license and dependency reasons, but this seems to be a very straight-forward approach. Thoughts?

misc projects

How fast OpenCube with generating surface data?

Not bad, but the VMD implementation is clearly faster, and I think with the EDT paper, a faster implementation of all types of surfaces could be found.