Talk:GSoC Ideas 2015: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ATenderholt (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== cclib == I know there has been opposition of linking the Python interpreter into Avogadro for license and dependency reasons, but this seems to be a very straight-forward...") |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
How fast OpenCube with generating surface data? | How fast OpenCube with generating surface data? | ||
Not bad, but the VMD implementation is clearly faster, and I think with the EDT paper, a faster implementation of all types of surfaces could be found. |
Revision as of 23:29, 24 January 2015
cclib
I know there has been opposition of linking the Python interpreter into Avogadro for license and dependency reasons, but this seems to be a very straight-forward approach. Thoughts?
misc projects
How fast OpenCube with generating surface data?
Not bad, but the VMD implementation is clearly faster, and I think with the EDT paper, a faster implementation of all types of surfaces could be found.